home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1991-04-20 | 58.6 KB | 2,346 lines |
-
-
-
- RFC:767
-
-
-
-
-
-
- A STRUCTURED FORMAT FOR TRANSMISSION OF MULTI-MEDIA DOCUMENTS
-
-
-
- Jonathan B. Postel
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- August 1980
-
-
-
-
- Information Sciences Institute
- University of Southern California
- 4676 Admiralty Way
- Marina del Rey, California 90291
-
- (213) 822-1511
-
-
- < INC-PROJECT, MMMSFS.NLS.21, >, 5-Sep-80 20:19 JBP ;;;;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
- PREFACE ........................................................ iii
-
- 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1
-
- 1.1. Motivation ................................................... 1
- 1.2. Scope ........................................................ 1
- 1.3. Terminology .................................................. 1
- 1.4. Document Description ......................................... 2
- 1.5. Other Work ................................................... 2
-
- 2. SPECIFICATION .................................................... 3
-
- 2.1. Document ..................................................... 3
- 2.2. Message Objects ............................................. 5
- 2.3. Body Structures ............................................. 13
- 2.3.1. Simple Elements ........................................... 13
- 2.3.2. Structured Text ........................................... 13
- 2.3.3. NLS File Example .......................................... 13
- 2.3.4. Multimedia Structures ..................................... 15
- 2.3.5. The Media ................................................. 21
- 2.3.6. TEXT ...................................................... 22
- 2.3.7. VOICE ..................................................... 22
- 2.3.8. FACSIMILE ................................................. 23
- 2.3.9. GRAPHICS .................................................. 24
-
- 3. EXAMPLES & SCENARIOS ............................................ 25
-
- Example 1: Text Example .......................................... 25
- Example 2: Multimedia Example .................................... 28
-
- REFERENCES .......................................................... 31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page i]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page ii] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
- PREFACE
-
-
-
- This is the first edition of this format specification and should be
- treated as a request for comments, advice, and suggestions. A great
- deal of prior work has been done on computer aided message systems and
- some of this is listed in the reference section. This specification was
- shaped by many discussions with members of the ARPA research community,
- and others interested in the development of computer aided message
- systems. This document was prepared as part of the ARPA sponsored
- Internetwork Concepts Research Project at ISI.
-
- Jon Postel
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page iii]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page iv]
-
-
-
- RFC: 767 J. Postel
- USC-ISI
- August 1980
-
-
-
-
- A STRUCTURED FORMAT FOR TRANSMISSION OF MULTI-MEDIA DOCUMENTS
-
-
-
- 1. INTRODUCTION
-
- This document describes a format for transmitting structured data
- representations of multimedia documents. This format is intended to be
- used with the Internet Message Protocol in an internetwork message
- delivery system. That system is designed to transmit messages between
- processes in host computers called Message Processing Modules (MPMs).
- MPMs are located in several networks and together constitute an
- internetwork message delivery system. The Internet Message Protocol
- defines a message as being composed of an Identification, a Command, and
- a Document. This report is intended to define the format of such
- Documents. The reader is assumed to be familiar with the Internet
- Message Protocol [1].
-
- 1.1. Motivation
-
- Computer applications are being implemented which interact with users
- in a variety of media (text, graphics, facsimile, speech). As
- computer devices become available to process multimedia information it
- becomes desirable to use computers to exchange multimedia information
- between programs and users via various mechanisms including computer
- mail.
-
- 1.2. Scope
-
- This format is intended to be used for the transmission of multimedia
- documents in the internetwork message delivery system, but it is
- thought that it has a wider applicability.
-
- 1.3. Terminology
-
- The messages are routed by a process called the Message Processing
- Module or MPM. Messages are created and consumed by User Interface
- Programs (UIPs) in conjunction with users.
-
- The basic unit transferred between MPMs is called a message. A
- message is made up of a transaction identifier (which uniquely
- identifies the message), a command (which contains the necessary
- information for delivery), and document. The document is a data
- structure.
-
- For a personal letter the document body corresponds to the contents of
-
-
- Postel [Page 1]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Introduction
-
-
-
- the letter; the document header corresponds to the date line,
- greeting, and signature.
-
- For an inter-office memo the document body corresponds to the text;
- the document header corresponds to the header of the memo.
-
- The commands correspond to the information used by the Post Office or
- the mail room to route the letter or memo. Some of the information in
- the command is supplied by the UIP.
-
- 1.4. Document Description
-
- The document is composed of fields. Each field will carry an
- identifying name. Typical fields are DATE, TO, SUBJECT, and BODY.
- Most of the fields will be very simple, some will be complex. The
- body field may be quite complex. For example, the DATE is a very
- constrained character string specifying the date and time in ISO
- format. A more complex example is the TO field which is a list of
- mailboxes, where a mailbox is itself a property list of address
- information items. The BODY may be simply a character string, or a
- very structured collection of data representing information in
- different media.
-
- The BODY may be structured to indicate a controlled presentation of
- multimedia information. There is provision for the inclusion of text,
- graphics, facsimile, and voice information in the body of documents.
- The presentation of information units may sequential, independent, or
- simultaneous.
-
- 1.5. Other Work
-
- This protocol the benefited from the earlier work on message protocols
- in the ARPA Network [2,3,4,5,6], and the ideas of others about the
- design of computer message systems [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 2] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
- 2. SPECIFICATION
-
- The structured format of a document is built on the basic data elements
- used in the Internet Message Protocol [1].
-
- 2.1. Document
-
- The document is a property list of <name,value> pairs called fields.
- A few fields are specifically required and many are optional. Some of
- the field values are simple and a few are quite complicated. In
- particular the body value may be highly structured.
-
- Older message systems have considered the document to be divided into
- a header and a body, and have used keywords to indicate specific
- header fields (e.g., date, to, subject). Roughly speaking, this
- functionality is provided in this new structured format by considering
- the name part of the <name,value> pair to be a keyword. In addition,
- this new structured format eliminates the separate treatment of the
- body.
-
- It is impossible to foresee the many forms documents will take so the
- standard for a document header must be flexible. The approach here is
- to define a set of basic fields and allow addition of whatever fields
- are necessary. Features added in this fashion may not be understood
- by others.
-
- The minimum document is a property list of the following fields:
-
- Name Value
- ---- -----
- DATE date string (name)
- SENDER a mailbox
- SUBJECT subject string (text)
- BODY a data structure
-
- A typical document is a property list containing the following fields:
-
- Name Value
- ---- -----
- DATE date string (name)
- SENDER a mailbox
- FROM list of mailboxes
- TO list of mailboxes
- CC list of mailboxes
- SUBJECT subject string (text)
- BODY a data structure
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 3]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- An elaborate document might contain the following fields:
-
- Name Value
- ---- -----
- DATE date string (name)
- SENDER a mailbox
- FROM list of mailboxes
- TO list of mailboxes
- CC list of mailboxes
- BCC list of mailboxes
- REPLY-TO list of mailboxes
- SUBJECT subject string (text)
- COMMENTS comment string (text)
- MESSAGE-ID message identifier of this message (text)
- IN-REPLY-TO message identifier of previous message (text)
- REFERENCES message identifiers of other messages (text)
- KEYWORDS key terms used in this message (text)
- BODY a data structure
-
- One of the key objects is the mailbox. It appears in the sender,
- from, to, cc, bcc, and reply-to fields. The mailbox is a property
- list of objects that combine to specify a destination recipient for a
- message. Most of the <name,value> pairs that make up a mailbox are
- identical to those used in the deliver command in the Internet Message
- Protocol [1]. A few additional <name,value> pairs are defined for use
- in a mailbox in the document context. In particular, there is a field
- for the real name of a person in contrast to the "user name" which
- identifies a computer account.
-
- In addition there is a field to specify a distribution group name.
- Such group names are used to indicate that a document is being sent to
- a group of recipients. This essentially presents an alternate form
- for a mailbox which consists of the single <name,value> pair for the
- group name. There is no required relationship between a group name
- mailbox and other mailboxes in the same list.
-
- For example, all of the following situations are allowed:
-
- . a mailbox list consisting of a single mailbox specifying a
- particular user,
-
- . a mailbox list consisting of a single mailbox with a group name,
-
- . a mailbox list consisting of a mailbox with a group name and a
- mailbox specifying a particular user, with either the user in or
- not in the group,
-
- . a mailbox list consisting of a mailbox with a group name and a
-
-
- [Page 4] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- several mailboxes specifying a particular users, with some users
- in the group and some not,
-
- . a mailbox list consisting of several mailboxes specifying group
- names and a several mailboxes specifying a particular users, with
- some users in the groups and some not.
-
-
-
- 2.2. Message Objects
-
- In the documents of messages, we use a set of objects such as mailbox
- or date. These objects are encoded in basic data elements. Some
- objects are simple things like integers or character strings, other
- objects are more complex things like lists or property lists. The
- following is a list of the objects used in messages. The object
- descriptions are in alphabetical order.
-
- Account
-
- The account information. Represented by a name element.
-
- Address
-
- Address is intended to contain the minimum information necessary to
- identify a user, and no more (compare with mailbox).
-
- An address is a property list which contains the following
- <name,value> pairs:
-
- name description
- ---- -----------
- NET network name
- HOST host name
- USER user name
-
- or:
-
- name description
- ---- -----------
- MPM mpm-identifier
- USER user name
-
- Answer
-
- A yes (true) or no (false) answer to a question. Represented by a
- boolean element.
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 5]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- BCC
-
- A list of mailboxes. The addresses of those who receive "blind
- carbon copies" of the message.
-
- Body
-
- A data structure. This may be as simple as a character string
- (represented by a name or text element), or complex structure of
- lists. It may be encrypted in part or in whole. Section 3.3
- describes some possible structured bodies.
-
- C
-
- A character. Represented by a name element.
-
- CC
-
- A list of mailboxes. When copies of a message are sent to others in
- addition to the addresses in the To object, those to whom the copies
- are sent will have their addresses recorded here.
-
- City
-
- A city. Represented by a name element.
-
- Comments
-
- A comment string. Represented by a text element.
-
- Count
-
- A count of items of some sort. Represented by a integer element.
-
- Country
-
- A country. Represented by a name element.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 6] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Date
-
- The date and time are represented according to the International
- Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations [19,20,21]. Taken
- together the ISO recommendations 2014, 3307, and 4031 result in the
- following representation of the date and time:
-
- yyyy-mm-dd-hh:mm:ss,fff+hh:mm
-
- Where yyyy is the four-digit year, mm is the two-digit month, dd is
- the two-digit day, hh is the two-digit hour in 24 hour time, mm is
- the two-digit minute, ss is the two-digit second, and fff is the
- decimal fraction of the second. To this basic date and time is
- appended the offset from Greenwich as plus or minus hh hours and mm
- minutes.
-
- The time is local time and the offset is the difference between
- local time and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). To convert from
- local time to UTC algebraically subtract the offset from the local
- time.
-
- For example, when the time in
- Los Angeles is 14:25:00-08:00
- the UTC is 22:25:00
-
- or when the time in
- Paris is 11:43:00+01:00
- the UTC is 10:43:00
-
- Device
-
- A device name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Document
-
- A property list of fields.
-
- Distribution Group
-
- An distribution group is a property list which contains the
- following <name,value> pair:
-
- name description
- ---- -----------
- GROUP document distribution group name
-
- This construct is used so that a distribution group will be a
- special case of a mailbox.
-
-
- Postel [Page 7]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Facsimile Structure
-
- A facsimile data structure. Represented by a property list.
-
- File
-
- A file name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Format
-
- A format indicator. Represented by a name element.
-
- From
-
- A list of mailboxes. The From is the name of the author of a
- document.
-
- Graphics Structure
-
- A graphics data structure. Represented by a property list.
-
- Group
-
- A document distribution group name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Host
-
- A host name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Ident
-
- The identifier of a person, usually their initials. Represented by
- a name element.
-
- In-Reply-To
-
- The message identifier of previous message. Represented by a text
- element.
-
- Internet Address
-
- This identifies a host in the ARPA internetwork environment. The
- internet address is a 32 bit number, the higher order 8 bits
- identify the network, and the lower order 24 bits identify the host
- on that network [22]. For use in this format the internet address
- is divided into eight bit fields and the value of each field is
- represented in decimal digits. For example, the ARPANET address of
- ISIE is 167837748 and is represented as 10,1,0,52. Further, this
-
-
- [Page 8] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- representation may be extended to include an address within a host,
- such as the TCP port of an MPM, for example, 10,1,0,52,0,45.
-
- Keywords
-
- The key terms used in this message. Represented by a text element.
-
- Mailbox
-
- This is the destination address of a user of the internetwork mail
- system. Mailbox contains information such as network, host,
- location, and local user identifier of the recipient of the message.
- The mailbox may contain information in addition to the minimum
- required for delivery.
-
- As an example, when one sends a message to someone for the first
- time, he may include many items to aid in identifying the correct
- recipient. However, once he gets a reply to this message, the reply
- will contain an Address (as opposed to Mailbox) which may be used
- from then on.
-
- A mailbox is a property list. A mailbox might contain the
- following <name,value> pairs:
-
- name description
- ---- -----------
- MPM mpm-identifier
- NET network name
- HOST host name
- PORT address of MPM within the host
- USER user name (computer account name)
- PERSON the real name of a person
- GROUP document distribution group
- ORG organization name
- CITY city
- STATE state
- COUNTRY country
- ZIP zip code
- PHONE phone number
-
- The minimum mail box is an Address or a Distribution Group.
-
- Message-ID
-
- The message identifier of this message. This is not related to the
- MPM message identification, but is a UIP long term document
- identifier. Represented by a text element.
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 9]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- MPM-Identifier
-
- The internetwork address of an MPM. This may be the ARPA Internet
- Address or an X.121 Public Data Network Address [23]. The
- mpm-identifier is a property list which has one <name,value> pair.
- This unusual structure is used so that it will be easy to determine
- the type of address used.
-
- Net
-
- A network name. Represented by a name element.
-
- NLS Block
-
- The information in an NLS node. Represented by a property list.
-
- NLS Node
-
- An NLS block and substructure. Represented by a property list.
-
- NLS Substructure
-
- A list of NLS nodes. Represented by a list.
-
- Org
-
- An organization name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Paragraph
-
- A paragraph of text. Represented by a text element.
-
- Parcel
-
- The basic unit of voice data. Represented by a bitstr element.
-
- Person
-
- The real name of a person. Represented by a name element.
-
- Password
-
- A password. Represented by a name element.
-
- Phone
-
- A phone number. Represented by a name element.
-
-
-
- [Page 10] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Pointer
-
- A pointer to information stored outside this data structure. A
- property list containing the information necessary to locate the
- external data, the information necessary to gain access to the
- external data, and the information necessary to apply the correct
- interpretation to the external data. For example, this might
- include:
-
- name description
- ---- -----------
- NET network name
- HOST host name
- FILE file name
- USER user name (computer account name)
- PASSWORD password
- ACCOUNT account
- FORMAT format
-
- Port
-
- The address of MPM within the host. Represented by a name element.
-
- Presentation Descriptor
-
- A property list of <name,value> pairs, where the name is an order
- indicator, and the value is a presentation element. The order
- indicators are SEQUENTIAL, SIMULTANEOUS, and INDEPENDENT.
-
- Presentation Element
-
- A property list of media structures.
-
- Protocol
-
- The name of the coding scheme used for a medium. Represented by a
- name element.
-
- References
-
- The message identifiers of other messages. Represented by a list of
- text elements.
-
- Reply-To
-
- A list of mailboxes. Sometimes it will be desired to direct the
- replies of a message to some address other than the from or the
- sender. In such a case the reply-to object can be used.
-
-
- Postel [Page 11]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- R 450 Block
-
- The unit of Rapicom 450 data (585 bits). Represented by a bitstr
- element.
-
- Sender
-
- A mailbox. The sender will contain the address of the individual
- who sent the message. In some cases this is NOT the same as the
- author of the message. Under such a condition, the author should be
- specified in the from object.
-
- SID
-
- An NLS statement indetifier. Represented by a integer element.
-
- State
-
- A state name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Subject
-
- The subject of the message. Represented by a text element.
-
- Text Structure
-
- A text data structure. Represented by a property list.
-
- To
-
- A list of mailboxes. To identifies the addressees of the message.
-
- User
-
- A user name (computer account name). Represented by a name element.
-
- Version
-
- A version number. Represented by a index element.
-
- Vocoder
-
- A vocoder name. Represented by a name element.
-
- Voice Structure
-
- A voice data structure. Represented by a property list.
-
-
-
- [Page 12] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- X121 Address
-
- This identifies a host in the Public Data Network environment. When
- used as a part of identifier, it identifies the originating host of
- a message. The X121 address is a sequence of up to 14 digits [23].
- For use in this format the X121 address is represented in decimal
- digits.
-
- ZIP
-
- A zip code. Represented by a name element.
-
- 2.3. Body Structures
-
- 2.3.1. Simple Elements
-
- The body could simply be a single data element. For example a
- single text element can represent a lengthy character string.
-
- <body> := TEXT
-
- or
-
- text:"this is the actual text of the body"
-
- 2.3.2. Structured Text
-
- The body could be thought of as paragraphs, where each paragraph is
- represented by a text element. The paragraphs are then the elements
- of a list.
-
- <body> := LIST (<paragraph>, <paragraph>, ...)
-
- <paragraph> := TEXT
-
- or
-
- list:(text:"paragraph one", text:"paragraph two", ...)
-
- 2.3.3. NLS File Example
-
- It is possible to represent the data from NLS files in this format.
- NLS is a large multipurpose system which operates on structured data
- files. The files are tree structured, and there is data associated
- with each node of the tree. There are several fields associated
- with each node as well.
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 13]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- An NLS file is:
-
- proplist( file
- name:"FILENAME", name:<file> name of file
- name:"CREATION-DATE", name:<date> creation date and time
- name:"VERSION", index:<version> file version number
- name:"SID-COUNT", integer<count> current SID count
- name:"LAST-WRITER", name:<ident> last writer of file
- name:"OWNER", name:<ident> owner of file
- name:"LAST-WRITE-TIME", name:<date> last write date and time
- name:"LEFT-NAME-DELIM-DEFAULT", name:<c> default name
- name:"RIGHT-NAME-DELIM-DEFAULT", name:<c> delimiters
- name:"SUBSTRUCTURE", <nls-substructure> substructure
- )endlist
-
- An NLS substructure is:
-
- list:( substructure
- <nls-node> node is defined below
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
-
- An NLS node is:
-
- proplist:( node
- name:"BLOCK", <nls-block> block defined below
- name:"SUBSTRUCTURE", <nls-substructure> substructure
- )endlist
-
- An NLS block is:
-
- proplist:( block
- name:"LEFT-NAME-DELIM", name:<c> left name delimiter
- name:"RIGHT-NAME-DELIM", name:<c> right name delimiter
- name:"SID", integer:<sid> SID number
- name:"CREATOR", name:<ident> statement creator
- name:"CREATION-TIME", name:<date> creation date and time
- name:"DATA", <data> data defined below
- )endlist
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 14] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- NLS data is:
-
- proplist:( data
- name:"<a data name>", <type depends on data name>
- . .
- . .
- . .
- )endlist
-
- For text, data is:
-
- proplist:( data
- name:"TEXT", text:"text of statement" text
- )endlist
-
- 2.3.4. Multimedia Structures
-
- One can conceive of graphical information being displayed along with
- a running commentary, much as seminars use slides. A slide and its
- description are tied together. The coordination of such a
- presentation is central to its understanding. This synchronization
- should be captured within the document structure.
-
- There are three fundamentally different types of time ordered
- control which are needed within the document structure. These are:
-
- Simultaneous
- Sequential
- Independent
-
- Simultaneous data is intended for synchronous presentation. The
- implication is that this data is presented in parallel.
-
- Sequential data items will be presented one at a time, in the order
- listed. The ordering is strictly left to right.
-
- Independent data can be presented in any time order. It is not
- ordered in any manner.
-
- The data is broken into small information units called presentation
- elements or PEs. The PEs can be combined in structures to control
- the presentation order. A PE is a property list of elements
- representing information of various media. For example:
-
- <pe> := proplist(
- name:"VOICE", <voice-structure>,
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics-structure>
- )endlist
-
-
- Postel [Page 15]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- PEs are combined into larger controled presentations by
- presentation-descriptors or PDs. A PD is a property list which
- specifies the type of time ordering of the PEs in its list.
-
- <pd> := <<seq>> | <<sim>> | <<ind>>
-
- <<seq>> := name:"SEQUENTIAL", <pe>
-
- <<sim>> := name:"SIMULTANEOUS", <pe>
-
- <<ind>> := name:"INDEPENDENT", <pe>
-
- A PE is a property list of the media <name,value> pairs, or PDs.
-
- <pe> := <<text>> | <<voice>> | <<facsimile>>
- | <<graphics>> | <pd>
-
- <<text>> := name:"TEXT", <text structure>
-
- <<voice>> := name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
-
- <<facsimile>> := name:"FACSIMILE", <facsimile structure>
-
- <<graphics>> := name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
-
- If more than one <name,value> pair is present within a PE the media
- are presented on different output devices in the order specified by
- the PE's parent PD. The order of appearance within the proplist is
- important only in the event that the parent PD specified sequential
- ordering.
-
- The structure of multimedia messages which use this scheme will be
- demonstrated by a few simple examples chosen to illustrate a basic
- text document and the different ordering options. The last example
- will suggest some more exotic uses.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 16] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Plain Text Message
-
- A simple text body could be represented in a single text data
- structure. To give the simplest example of a structured body we
- show a simple text body represented in the multimedia structure.
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<seq>>
-
- <<seq>> := name:"SEQUENTIAL", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"TEXT", <text structure>
-
- or
-
- proplist: (name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"TEXT", <text structure>
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
- Simultaneous Ordering
-
- This ordering option is used to indicate when separate streams are
- to be presented in parallel. For example, assume GRAPHICS and
- VOICE data were to be presented using simultaneously.
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<sim>>
-
- <<sim>> := name:"SIMULTANEOUS", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
-
- or
-
- proplist:(
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 17]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Sequential Ordering
-
- This option is used to indicate sequential time ordering. The
- media in the sub-tree below this PD are not separate streams.
- Using again the example above, assume GRAPHICS and VOICE data were
- to be presented using sequential ordering.
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<seq>>
-
- <<seq>> := name:"SEQUENTIAL", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
-
- or
-
- proplist:(
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
- Independent Ordering
-
- It is apparent that some output devices are very slow in
- comparison to others. An example which demonstrates this is
- facsimile. The majority of facsimile devices are slow. A
- detailed picture transmitted at 9600 baud takes minutes to print.
- It is inconvenient for the user to wait on such a device when the
- voice or text information which accompanies it is short.
-
- For example, if the document a facsimile image and the text
- "Hello Frank, here's a copy of that picture you requested." The
- user need not wait for the picture. The facsimile machine might
- be spooled, in which case he would pick up the picture later. In
- a sense the picture was time independent of the text.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 18] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<ind>>
-
- <<ind>> := name:"INDEPENDENT", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"FACSIMILE", <facsimile structure>
- name:"TEXT", <text structure>
-
- or
-
- proplist:(
- name:"INDEPENDENT",
- proplist:(
- name:"FACSIMILE", <facsimile structure>
- name:"TEXT", <text structure>
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
- A Stream Example
-
- By making use of the structure and the sequential ordering option
- it is possible to initiate a stream. The stream will proceed at
- its own pace until concluded.
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<seq>>
-
- <<seq>> := name:"SEQUENTIAL", <pe>
-
- <pe> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := <<sim>>
-
- <<sim>> := name:"SIMULTANEOUS", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 19]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- or
-
- proplist:(
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist,
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist,
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
- Such a document structure suggests a slide presentation.
-
- Multiple Active Stream Example
-
- This example is exotic but illustrates what is possible. By making
- use of the structure and the simultaneous ordering it is possible
- to start in parallel two or more separate streams. Each stream
- will proceed at its own pace until all are concluded.
-
- <body> := <pd>
-
- <pd> := name:"SIMULTANEOUS", <pe>
-
- <pe> = <pd>
-
- <pd> := name:"SEQUENTIAL", <pe>
-
- <pe> = <pd>
-
- <pd> := name:"SIMULTANEOUS", <pe>
-
- <pe> := name:"VOICE",
- <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS",
- <graphics structure>
-
-
-
-
- [Page 20] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- or
-
- proplist:(
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist,
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist,
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE", <voice structure>
- name:"GRAPHICS", <graphics structure>
- )endlist,
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
- 2.3.5. The Media
-
- So far no explicit description has been given for the media classes
- which fit into a PE. It is not known what types of media will be
- supported in the various document stations in the future. Those for
- which support is in part already available are:
-
- TEXT
- VOICE
- FACSIMILE
- GRAPHICS
-
- Standard formats for data in each of these media must be defined.
-
-
- Postel [Page 21]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- 2.3.6. TEXT
-
- The text data may be structured according to a variety of protocols
- (yet to be defined). The top level of the data structure is a
- property list which identifies the protocol, and the version of that
- protocol.
-
- name:"TEXT", proplist:(
- name:"PROTOCOL", <protocol>,
- name:"VERSION", <version>,
- name:"DATA", <data>
- )endlist
-
- The first protocol is called PARAGRAPH, and the data is a list of
- paragraphs, where each paragraph is a text element.
-
- name:"DATA", list:(
- text: <paragraph>
- text: <paragraph>
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
-
- 2.3.7. VOICE
-
- Since a good deal of research has been done towards implementing the
- transmission of voice data on the ARPANET, the Network Voice
- Protocol (NVP) provides the basis for the standard for voice data
- [24].
-
- Voice data a property list which specifies the vocoder being used,
- the transmission protocol and the parcel data. The parcel data form
- is specific to the protocol used and is grouped in lists.
-
- name:"VOICE", proplist:(
- name:"VOCODER", <vocoder>,
- name:"PROTOCOL", <protocol>,
- name:"VERSION", <version>,
- name:"DATA", <data>
- )endlist
-
- The NVP protocol has a number of parameters, the version number
- specifies a certain set of the parameters used by the vocoder
- hardware and software to set up timing and define the type of coding
- used. It is not expected that within a document the version number
- will change.
-
-
-
- [Page 22] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- NVP itself supports negotiation of these parameters to insure both
- ends of a network speech connection 'understand' one another. Since
- no such interactive negotiation is possible in a document system,
- negotiation capabilities have been excluded. As differing hardware
- becomes available new versions may be defined.
-
- For the NVP protocol the data list will take the following form:
-
- name:"DATA", list:(
- bitstr: <parcel>
- bitstr: <parcel>
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
-
- The items in the list are parcels. The individual parcels are bit
- string data elements whose contents and length are predefined by the
- version number. The number of parcels in a parcel group is
- available from the item count in the enclosing list header.
-
- 2.3.8. FACSIMILE
-
- There are a number of facsimile devices in use. While standards are
- being established by CCITT [25], of the devices available today many
- are incompatible due to proprietary compression algorithms. The
- description of fax data will allow for the possibility of several
- protocols.
-
- name:"FACSIMILE", proplist:(
- name:"DEVICE", <device>,
- name:"PROTOCOL", <protocol>,
- name:"DATA", <data>
- )endlist
-
- There are few facsimile devices interfaced to computers though, and
- the existing experiments in the ARPANET all use the RAPICOM 450. A
- first facsimile standard format will be based on the data structure
- used for this machine [26]. That is, for device RAPICOM450 and
- protocol BLOCK, the data will be:
-
- name:"DATA", list:(
- bitstr:<r450-block>,
- bitstr:<r450-block>,
- .
- .
- .
- )endlist
-
-
- Postel [Page 23]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Specification
-
-
-
- Where an r450-block is a 585 bit unit.
-
- 2.3.9. GRAPHICS
-
- The situation for graphics bears much similarity to facsimile.
- Devices on the market today have a variety of user interfaces and
- options. A similar structure is defined.
-
- name:"GRAPHICS", proplist:(
- name:"DEVICE", <device>,
- name:"PROTOCOL", <protocol>,
- name:"DATA", <data>
- )endlist
-
- There are several candidate protocols for use in describing graphics
- data in documents. One is the Network Graphics Protocol [27],
- another is the Graphics Language [28,29], and a third is the
- SIGGRAPH Core System [30].
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 24] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
- 3. EXAMPLES & SCENARIOS
-
- Example 1: Text Example
-
- Suppose we want to send the following message:
-
- Date: 1979-03-29-11:46-08:00
- From: Jon Postel <Postel@ISIF>
- Subject: Meeting Thursday
- To: Danny Cohen <Cohen@ISIB>
- CC: Linda
-
- Danny:
-
- Please mark your calendar for our meeting Thursday at 3 pm.
-
- --jon.
-
- It will be encoded in the structured format. The following will
- present successive steps in the top down generation of this message.
- The identification and command portions of the messages will not be
- expanded here (see [1]).
-
- 1. message
-
- 2. (identification, command, document)
-
- 3. (ID:<<identification>>,
- CMD:<<command>>,
- DOC:( date, from, subject, to, cc, body))
-
- 4. (ID:<<identification>>,
- CMD:<<command>>,
- DOC:(DATE:date,
- FROM:from
- SUBJECT:subject,
- TO:to,
- CC:cc,
- BODY:body))
-
- 5. (ID:<<identification>>,
- CMD:<<command>>,
- DOC:(DATE: 1979-03-29-11:46-08:00,
- FROM: (NET:ARPANET,HOST:ISIF,USER:Postel,PERSON:Jon Postel),
- SUBJECT: Meeting Thursday,
- TO: (NET:ARPANET,HOST:ISIB,USER:Cohen,PERSON:Danny Cohen),
- CC: (NET:ARPANET,HOST:ISIF,USER:Linda),
- BODY:
- Danny:
-
-
- Postel [Page 25]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Examples & Scenarios
-
-
-
-
- Please mark your calendar for our meeting
- Thursday at 3 pm.
-
- --jon.))
-
- 6. PROPLIST:
- (ID:<<identification>>,
- CMD:<<command>>,
- DOC:
- PROPLIST:(
- DATE: 1979-03-29-11:46-08:00,
- FROM:
- LIST:(
- PROPLIST:(
- NET:ARPANET,
- HOST:ISIF,
- USER:Postel,
- PERSON:Jon Postel,
- )ENDLIST,
- )ENDLIST,
- SUBJECT: Meeting Thursday,
- TO:
- LIST:(
- PROPLIST:(
- NET:ARPANET,
- HOST:ISIB,
- USER:Cohen,
- PERSON:Danny Cohen,
- )ENDLIST,
- )ENDLIST,
- CC:
- LIST:(
- PROPLIST:(
- NET:ARPANET,
- HOST:ISIF,
- USER:Linda,
- )ENDLIST,
- )ENDLIST,
- BODY:
- Danny:
-
- Please mark your calendar for our meeting
- Thursday at 3 pm.
-
- --jon.
- )ENDLIST
- )ENDLIST
-
-
- [Page 26] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Examples & Scenarios
-
-
-
- 7. proplist:(
- name:"ID", <<identification>>,
- name:"CMD", <<command>>,
- name:"DOC",
- proplist:(
- name:"DATE", name:"1979-03-29-11:46-08:00",
- name:"FROM",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"NET", name:"ARPANET",
- name:"HOST", name:"ISIF",
- name:"USER", name:"Postel",
- name:"PERSON", name:"Jon Postel",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"SUBJECT", text:"Meeting Thursday",
- name:"TO",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"NET", name:"ARPANET",
- name:"HOST", name:"ISIB",
- name:"USER", name:"Cohen",
- name:"PERSON", name:"Danny Cohen",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"CC",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"NET", name:"ARPANET",
- name:"HOST", name:"ISIF",
- name:"USER", name:"Linda",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"BODY",
- text:"Danny:
-
- Please mark your calendar for our
- meeting Thursday at 3 pm.
-
- --jon."
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 27]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Examples & Scenarios
-
-
-
- Example 2: Multimedia Example
-
-
-
- proplist:(
- name:"ID", <<identification>>,
- name:"CMD", <<command>>,
- name:"DOC",
- proplist:(
- name:"DATE", name:"1980-08-06-11:46-08:00",
- name:"FROM",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"NET", name:"ARPANET",
- name:"HOST", name:"ISIF",
- name:"USER", name:"Postel",
- name:"PERSON", name:"Jon Postel",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"SUBJECT", text:"Multimedia Test Message",
- name:"TO",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"GROUP", name:"Multimedia Experiment List",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"CC",
- list:(
- proplist:(
- name:"NET", name:"ARPANET",
- name:"HOST", name:"ISIF",
- name:"USER", name:"Linda",
- )endlist,
- )endlist,
- name:"BODY",
- proplist:(
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"TEXT",
- proplist:(
- name:"PROTOCOL", name:"PARAGRAPH",
- name:"VERSION", index:"1",
- name:"DATA",
- list:(
- text:"This is a test of multimedia mail."
- text:"I hope you like it."
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
-
- [Page 28] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- Examples & Scenarios
-
-
-
- name:"SIMULTANEOUS",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOICE",
- proplist:(
- name:"VOCODER", name:<vocoder>,
- name:"PROTOCOL", name:"NVP",
- name:"VERSION", index:"1",
- name:"DATA",
- list:(
- bitstr:<parcel>
- bitstr:<parcel>
- )endlist
- )endlist
- name:"GRAPHICS",
- proplist:(
- name:"DEVICE", name:<device>,
- name:"PROTOCOL", name:<protocol>,
- name:"VERSION", index:<version>,
- name:"DATA",<data>
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
- name:"SEQUENTIAL",
- proplist:(
- name:"TEXT,
- proplist:(
- name:"PROTOCOL", name:"PARAGRAPH",
- name:"VERSION", index:"1",
- name:"DATA",
- list:(
- text:"That was supposed to be some voice
- and graphics in parallel."
- text:"--jon."
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
- )endlist
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 29]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 30] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
- REFERENCES
-
-
- [1] Postel, J., "Internet Message Protocol," RFC 759, 113,
- USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1980.
-
- [2] Bhushan, A., K. Pogran, R. Tomlinson, and J. White, "Standardizing
- Network Mail Headers," RFC 561, NIC 18516, September 1973.
-
- [3] Myer, T., and D. Henderson, "Message Transmission Protocol,"
- RFC 680, NIC 32116, 30 April 1975.
-
- [4] Crocker, D., J. Vittal, K. Pogran, and D. Henderson, "Standard for
- the Format of ARPA Network Text Messages," RFC 733, NIC 41952,
- 21 November 1977.
-
- [5] Barber, D., and J. Laws, "A Basic Mail Scheme for EIN," INWG 192,
- February 1979.
-
- [6] Braaten, O., "Introduction to a Mail Protocol," Norwegian
- Computing Center, INWG 180, August 1978.
-
- [7] Crocker, D., E. Szurkowski, and D. Farber, "An Internetwork Memo
- Distribution Capability - MMDF," Sixth Data Communications
- Symposium, ACM/IEEE, November 1979.
-
- [8] Haverty, J., D. Henderson, and D. Oestreicher, "Proposed
- Specification of an Inter-site Message Protocol," 8 July 1975.
-
- [9] Thomas, R., "Providing Mail Services for NSW Users," BBN NSW
- Working Note 24, Bolt Beranek and Newman, October 1978.
-
- [10] White, J., "A Proposed Mail Protocol," RFC 524, NIC 17140, SRI
- International, 13 June 1973.
-
- [11] White, J., "Description of a Multi-Host Journal," NIC 23144, SRI
- International, 30 May 1974.
-
- [12] White, J., "Journal Subscription Service," NIC 23143, SRI
- International, 28 May 1974.
-
- [13] Levin, R., and M. Schroeder, "Transport of Electronic Messages
- Through a Network," Teleinformatics 79, Boutmy & Danthine (eds.)
- North Holland Publishing Co., 1979.
-
- [14] Earnest, L., and J. McCarthy, "DIALNET: A Computer Communications
- Study," Computer Science Department, Stanford University, August
- 1978.
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 31]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- References
-
-
-
- [15] Crispin M., "DIALNET: A Telephone Network Data Communications
- Protocol," DECUS Proceedings, Fall 1979.
-
- [16] Caulkins, D., "The Personal Computer Network (PCNET) Project: A
- Status Report," Dr. Dobbs Journal of Computer Calisthenics and
- Orthodontia, v.5, n.6, June 1980.
-
- [17] Postel, J., "NSW Transaction Protocol (NSWTP)," USC/Information
- Sciences Institute, IEN 38, May 1978.
-
- [18] Haverty, J., "MSDTP -- Message Services Data Transmission
- Protocol," RFC 713, NIC 34739, April 1976.
-
- [19] ISO-2014, "Writing of calendar dates in all-numeric form,"
- Recommendation 2014, International Organization for
- Standardization, 1975.
-
- [20] ISO-3307, "Information Interchange -- Representations of time of
- the day," Recommendation 3307, International Organization for
- Standardization, 1975.
-
- [21] ISO-4031, "Information Interchange -- Representation of local time
- differentials," Recommendation 4031, International Organization
- for Standardization, 1978.
-
- [22] Postel, J., "DOD Standard Internet Protocol," USC/Information
- Sciences Institute, IEN 128, NTIS number AD A079730, January 1980.
-
- [23] CCITT-X.121, "International Numbering Plan for Public Data
- Networks," Recommendation X.121, CCITT, Geneva, 1978.
-
- [24] Cohen, D., "Specifications for the Network Voice Protocol (NVP),"
- NIC 42444, RFC 741, NSC 68, RR-75-39, USC/Information Sciences
- Institute, January 1976.
-
- [25] CCITT-T.30, "Procedures for Document Facsimile Transmission in the
- General Switched Telephone Network," Recommendation T.30, Orange
- Book, V. 7, The International Telephone and Telegraph Consulative
- Committee, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 1977.
-
- [26] Treadwell, S., "FAX File Format," ARPANET Message, 14 November
- 1979.
-
- [27] Sproull, R., and E. Thomas, "A Network Graphics Protocol,"
- NIC 24308, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, August 1974.
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 32] Postel
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
- References
-
-
-
- [28] Bisbey, R., and D. Hollingworth, "A Distributable,
- Display-Device-Independent Vector Graphics System for Command and
- Control," RR-80-87, USC/Information Sciences Institute, July 1980.
-
- [29] Bisbey, R., D. Hollingworth, and B. Britt, "Graphics Language,"
- TM-80-18, USC/Information Sciences Institute, July 1980.
-
- [30] Graphics Standard Planning Committee, "Core System," Computer
- Graphics, V. 13, N. 3, SIGGRAPH, ACM, August 1979.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Postel [Page 33]
-
-
- August 1980
- A Structured Format for Transmission of Multi-Media Documents
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 34] Postel
-
-